GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.7 Flash is 3.6× cheaper than GPT-6 Luna on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6 Luna has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
| GPT-6 Luna | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.10 | $0.03 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.50 | $0.13 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.20 | $0.055 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.01 | $0.006 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Intelligence index | 37.3 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 7 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-07-27 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is 3.6× cheaper than GPT-6 Luna on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.7 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6 Luna ≈ $450.00, Qwen3.7 Flash ≈ $125.00.
More comparisons
GPT-6 Luna vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-6 Luna vs Command A+GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 SolGPT-6 Luna vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Luna vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-6 Luna vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-6 Luna vs Grok 4.7GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-6 Luna vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-6 Luna vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Astra ProGPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.7 Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.7 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.7 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.7 Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.7 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3.7 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed