GLM 5.3 Prime vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 Prime

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$2.80 / $8.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $2.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
Q
Verdict: Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 5.7× cheaper than GLM 5.3 Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Prime has the larger context window (1M vs 82K).
GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$2.80$0.20
Output price / 1M$8.80$2.40
Blended price (3:1)$4.30$0.75
Cached input / 1M$0.56
Context window1M82K
Max output131K33K
Intelligence index9.8
Coding index12.1
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-232025-08-28
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Prime or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 5.7× cheaper than GLM 5.3 Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Prime vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Prime: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Prime ≈ $10,000, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,600.

More comparisons