GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $2.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
Q
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 21% cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 82K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.20
Output price / 1M$1.25$2.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.75
Cached input / 1M$0.09
Context window1M82K
Max output131K33K
Intelligence index9.8
Coding index12.1
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-182025-08-28
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

GLM 5.3 FlashX is 21% cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,600.

More comparisons