Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic
$4.00 / $20.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $2.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
Q
Verdict: Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 10.7× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (57.6 vs 9.8). Claude Opus 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 82K).
Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$4.00$0.20
Output price / 1M$20.00$2.40
Blended price (3:1)$8.00$0.75
Cached input / 1M$0.20
Context window1M82K
Max output128K33K
Intelligence index57.69.8
Coding index12.1
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222025-08-28
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 10.7× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,600.

More comparisons