Command A+ vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

C

Command A+

Cohere
$0.30 / $1.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $2.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
C
Q
Verdict: Command A+ is 20% cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A+ has the larger context window (192K vs 82K).
Command A+Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.20
Output price / 1M$1.50$2.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.60$0.75
Cached input / 1M$0.15
Context window192K82K
Max output64K33K
Intelligence index9.8
Coding index12.1
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222025-08-28
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Command A+ is 20% cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Command A+ vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Command A+: 192,000 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A+ ≈ $1,350, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,600.

More comparisons