MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi

$0.14 / $0.28

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)

$0.20 / $2.40

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4.3× cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 82K).

	MiMo-V2.6-Flash	Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M	$0.14	$0.20
Output price / 1M	$0.28	$2.40
Blended price (3:1)	$0.18	$0.75
Cached input / 1M	$0.0028	—
Context window	1M	82K
Max output	131K	33K
Intelligence index	—	9.8
Coding index	—	12.1
Providers	2	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	99.3%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-21	2025-08-28
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4.3× cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,600.

More comparisons