Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
NVIDIA
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 13.0× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price / 1M$0.15$2.00
Output price / 1M$0.47$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.23$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.02$0.25
Context window1M1M
Max output944K131K
Intelligence index13.6—
Coding index—71.9
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-152026-08-12
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 13.0× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons