Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.80 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
NVIDIA
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 4.3× cheaper than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has the larger context window (131K vs 128K).
Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.20$0.80
Output price / 1M$0.20$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.85
Cached input / 1M$0.40
Context window131K128K
Max output118K115K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingNoNo
Released2026-06-042025-02-01
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 4.3× cheaper than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct ≈ $2,100.

More comparisons