MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi

$0.14 / $0.28

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA

$0.20 / $0.20

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 13% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).

	MiMo-V2.6-Flash	Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M	$0.14	$0.20
Output price / 1M	$0.28	$0.20
Blended price (3:1)	$0.18	$0.20
Cached input / 1M	$0.0028	—
Context window	1M	131K
Max output	131K	118K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	2	1
Best provider uptime (30m)	99.9%	—
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	No
Released	2026-09-21	2026-06-04
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 13% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons