GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 2.9× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXNemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.20
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.09
Context window1M131K
Max output131K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-182026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 2.9× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons