DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.022 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
NVIDIA
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 42% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashNemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.022$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.40$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.12$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.004—
Context window1M131K
Max output944K118K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers361
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-102026-06-04
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 42% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $244.00, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons