Muse Ember vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Muse Ember is 13% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| Muse Ember | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.10 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.50 | $0.47 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.20 | $0.23 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.004 | $0.02 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 944K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | — | 13.6 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 10 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-11-09 | 2026-10-15 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Muse Ember or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?
Muse Ember is 13% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Muse Ember vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?
Muse Ember: 1,048,576 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Muse Ember ≈ $450.00, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00.
More comparisons
Muse Ember vs Gemini 4 CarbonMuse Ember vs Claude Fable 5.2Muse Ember vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMuse Ember vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMuse Ember vs Hy4Muse Ember vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMuse Ember vs GPT-6.1 TerraMuse Ember vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProMuse Ember vs Kimi K3.1 ProMuse Ember vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashMuse Ember vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Ember vs Gemini 4 ArgonMuse Ember vs Claude Haiku 5.5Muse Ember vs Nano Banana 2.1Muse Ember vs Mistral Large 4Muse Ember vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini 4 CarbonNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Claude Fable 5.2Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Hy4Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GPT-6.1 TerraNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro