DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Ember

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta

Muse Ember

Meta
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Meta
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 26% cheaper than Muse Ember on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Ember
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.29$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.004
Context window1M1M
Max output393K944K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index——
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172026-11-09
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Muse Ember?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 26% cheaper than Muse Ember on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Ember: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Muse Ember: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Muse Ember ≈ $450.00.

More comparisons