Claude Fable 5.2 vs Muse Ember
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Muse Ember is 80.0× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Muse Ember has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
| Claude Fable 5.2 | Muse Ember | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $8.00 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $40.00 | $0.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $16.00 | $0.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | $0.004 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | 64.6 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 5 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-11-07 | 2026-11-09 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Muse Ember?
Muse Ember is 80.0× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Muse Ember: which has a bigger context window?
Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Muse Ember: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Muse Ember ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 CarbonClaude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashClaude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.2 vs Hy4Claude Fable 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalClaude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 TerraClaude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProClaude Fable 5.2 vs Kimi K3.1 ProClaude Fable 5.2 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLClaude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 ArgonClaude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nano Banana 2.1Claude Fable 5.2 vs Mistral Large 4Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProMuse Ember vs Gemini 4 CarbonMuse Ember vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMuse Ember vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMuse Ember vs Hy4Muse Ember vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMuse Ember vs GPT-6.1 TerraMuse Ember vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProMuse Ember vs Kimi K3.1 Pro