Nano Banana 2.1 vs Muse Ember
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Muse Ember is 15.0× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Muse Ember has the larger context window (1M vs 66K).
| Nano Banana 2.1 | Muse Ember | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.50 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $7.50 | $0.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.00 | $0.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.004 |
| Context window | 66K | 1M |
| Max output | 59K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-06 | 2026-11-09 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Muse Ember?
Muse Ember is 15.0× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Nano Banana 2.1 vs Muse Ember: which has a bigger context window?
Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Muse Ember: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Muse Ember ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
Nano Banana 2.1 vs Gemini 4 CarbonNano Banana 2.1 vs Claude Fable 5.2Nano Banana 2.1 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashNano Banana 2.1 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashNano Banana 2.1 vs Hy4Nano Banana 2.1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalNano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 TerraNano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProNano Banana 2.1 vs Kimi K3.1 ProNano Banana 2.1 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashNano Banana 2.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nano Banana 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNano Banana 2.1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonNano Banana 2.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Nano Banana 2.1 vs Mistral Large 4Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProMuse Ember vs Gemini 4 CarbonMuse Ember vs Claude Fable 5.2Muse Ember vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMuse Ember vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMuse Ember vs Hy4Muse Ember vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMuse Ember vs GPT-6.1 TerraMuse Ember vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro