MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Muse Ember
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Muse Ember is 24% cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Muse Ember | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.15 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.60 | $0.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.26 | $0.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.015 | $0.004 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 524K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | 29.1 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 11 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-19 | 2026-11-09 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Muse Ember?
Muse Ember is 24% cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Muse Ember: which has a bigger context window?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Muse Ember: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Muse Ember ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Hy4MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Mistral Large 4MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProMuse Ember vs Gemini 4 CarbonMuse Ember vs Claude Fable 5.2Muse Ember vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMuse Ember vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMuse Ember vs Hy4Muse Ember vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMuse Ember vs GPT-6.1 TerraMuse Ember vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro