MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 11.4× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
MiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price / 1M$0.15$2.00
Output price / 1M$0.60$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.25
Context window1M1M
Max output524K131K
Intelligence index29.1—
Coding index—71.9
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192026-08-12
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 11.4× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons