MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.55 / $3.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Xiaomi
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 7.4× cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
MiMo-V2.6-FlashQwen3.5 397B A17B
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.55
Output price / 1M$0.28$3.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$1.29
Cached input / 1M$0.0028$0.23
Context window1M262K
Max output131K236K
Intelligence index18.4
Coding index48.2
Providers2
Best provider uptime (30m)99.6%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212026-02-16
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 7.4× cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen3.5 397B A17B ≈ $2,850.

More comparisons