MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.40 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Xiaomi
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 7.4× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
MiMo-V2.6-FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.40
Output price / 1M$0.28$4.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$1.30
Cached input / 1M$0.0028
Context window1M131K
Max output131K33K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers2
Best provider uptime (30m)99.3%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212025-09-23
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 7.4× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ≈ $2,800.

More comparisons