Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini 4 Carbon

Google
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.40 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 3.1× cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 4 Carbon scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (60 vs 13.4). Gemini 4 Carbon has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.40
Output price / 1M$10.00$4.00
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$1.30
Cached input / 1M$0.10—
Context window1M131K
Max output944K33K
Intelligence index6013.4
Coding index——
Providers7—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-102025-09-23
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 3.1× cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 4 Carbon: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 4 Carbon ≈ $9,000, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ≈ $2,800.

More comparisons