Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Google
$1.50 / $9.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.40 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 2.6× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.40
Output price / 1M$9.00$4.00
Blended price (3:1)$3.38$1.30
Cached input / 1M——
Context window131K131K
Max output66K33K
Intelligence index—13.4
Coding index——
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-11-042025-09-23
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 2.6× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash ≈ $7,500, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ≈ $2,800.

More comparisons