MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

X

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.30 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
X
Q
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.7× cheaper than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
MiMo-V2.6-FlashQwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.30
Output price / 1M$0.28$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.47
Cached input / 1M$0.0028$0.10
Context window1M262K
Max output131K66K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers2
Best provider uptime (30m)99.2%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212025-07-23
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.7× cheaper than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ≈ $1,100.

More comparisons