MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.80 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Xiaomi
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4.9× cheaper than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 128K).
MiMo-V2.6-FlashQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.80
Output price / 1M$0.28$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.85
Cached input / 1M$0.0028$0.40
Context window1.1M128K
Max output131K115K
Intelligence index26.7—
Coding index——
Providers8—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-212025-02-01
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4.9× cheaper than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct ≈ $2,100.

More comparisons