Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.80 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is 18.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
Claude Fable 5.2Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.80
Output price / 1M$40.00$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.85
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.40
Context window1M128K
Max output128K115K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-11-072025-02-01
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is 18.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct ≈ $2,100.

More comparisons