Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Google
$1.50 / $9.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.80 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is 4.0× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash has the larger context window (131K vs 128K).
Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.80
Output price / 1M$9.00$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$3.38$0.85
Cached input / 1M—$0.40
Context window131K128K
Max output66K115K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingNoNo
Released2026-11-042025-02-01
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is 4.0× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash: 131,072 tokens. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash ≈ $7,500, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct ≈ $2,100.

More comparisons