Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
NVIDIA
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 80.0× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Claude Fable 5.2Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.20
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.20—
Context window1M131K
Max output128K118K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers51
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-11-072026-06-04
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 80.0× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons