Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta Llama

Llama Guard 4 12B

Meta Llama
$0.18 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.45 / $3.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta Llama
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 6.7× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama Guard 4 12B has the larger context window (164K vs 128K).
Llama Guard 4 12BQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$0.18$0.45
Output price / 1M$0.18$3.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$1.21
Cached input / 1M——
Context window164K128K
Max output16K16K
Intelligence index——
Coding index—22.1
Providers3—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-04-302025-07-25
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Llama Guard 4 12B is 6.7× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ≈ $2,650.

More comparisons