Llama Guard 4 12B vs Pareto 26.10

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta Llama

Llama Guard 4 12B

Meta Llama
$0.18 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
U

Pareto 26.10

Unbiased
$0.80 / $3.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta Llama
U
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 7.8× cheaper than Pareto 26.10 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Pareto 26.10 has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
Llama Guard 4 12BPareto 26.10
Input price / 1M$0.18$0.80
Output price / 1M$0.18$3.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$1.40
Cached input / 1M—$0.03
Context window164K1M
Max output16K131K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers3—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-04-302026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Pareto 26.10?

Llama Guard 4 12B is 7.8× cheaper than Pareto 26.10 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama Guard 4 12B vs Pareto 26.10: which has a bigger context window?

Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Pareto 26.10: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, Pareto 26.10 ≈ $3,200.

More comparisons