Llama 4 Scout vs Weaver (alpha)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta Llama

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Weaver (alpha)

Mancer
$0.30 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta Llama
M
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 2.3× cheaper than Weaver (alpha) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 8K).
Llama 4 ScoutWeaver (alpha)
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.30
Output price / 1M$0.30$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.35
Cached input / 1M—$0.30
Context window1.3M8K
Max output16K6K
Intelligence index——
Coding index8.2—
Providers4—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2025-04-052023-08-02
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Weaver (alpha)?

Llama 4 Scout is 2.3× cheaper than Weaver (alpha) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 4 Scout vs Weaver (alpha): which has a bigger context window?

Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Weaver (alpha): 8,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00, Weaver (alpha) ≈ $850.00.

More comparisons