Claude Fable 5.2 vs Weaver (alpha)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Weaver (alpha)

Mancer
$0.30 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
M
Verdict: Weaver (alpha) is 45.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
Claude Fable 5.2Weaver (alpha)
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.30
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.35
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.30
Context window1M8K
Max output128K6K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-11-072023-08-02
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Weaver (alpha)?

Weaver (alpha) is 45.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Weaver (alpha): which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Weaver (alpha): 8,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Weaver (alpha) ≈ $850.00.

More comparisons