Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta Llama

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.29 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta Llama
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 3.1× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).
Llama 4 ScoutQwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.29
Output price / 1M$0.30$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.47
Cached input / 1M——
Context window1.3M262K
Max output16K236K
Intelligence index——
Coding index8.2—
Providers4—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-04-052025-10-06
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Llama 4 Scout is 3.1× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ≈ $1,080.

More comparisons