GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.29 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 21% cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalQwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.29
Output price / 1M$1.25$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.47
Cached input / 1M$0.075—
Context window1M262K
Max output131K236K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-022025-10-06
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 21% cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal ≈ $1,365, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ≈ $1,080.

More comparisons