Llama 4 Scout vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
N
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 25% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 131K).
Llama 4 ScoutNemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.30$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.20
Cached input / 1M
Context window1.3M131K
Max output16K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index8.2
Providers31
Best provider uptime (30m)99.9%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2025-04-052026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Llama 4 Scout is 25% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 4 Scout vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons