Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.021 / $0.063
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $2.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
Q
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 23.8× cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash has the larger context window (262K vs 82K).
Ling 3.0 FlashQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$0.021$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.063$2.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.0315$0.75
Cached input / 1M$0.0042
Context window262K82K
Max output33K33K
Intelligence index9.8
Coding index50.612.1
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-07-232025-08-28
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Ling 3.0 Flash is 23.8× cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,600.

More comparisons