Nano Banana 2.1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana 2.1

Google
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.021 / $0.063
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 95.2× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash has the larger context window (262K vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2.1Ling 3.0 Flash
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.021
Output price / 1M$7.50$0.063
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.0315
Cached input / 1M—$0.0042
Context window66K262K
Max output59K33K
Intelligence index——
Coding index—50.6
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-062026-07-23
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Ling 3.0 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash is 95.2× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2.1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50.

More comparisons