DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek

$0.098 / $0.29

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash

inclusionAI

$0.021 / $0.063

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 4.7× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	Ling 3.0 Flash
Input price / 1M	$0.098	$0.021
Output price / 1M	$0.29	$0.063
Blended price (3:1)	$0.15	$0.0315
Cached input / 1M	$0.0029	$0.0042
Context window	1M	262K
Max output	393K	33K
Intelligence index	28.6	—
Coding index	—	50.6
Providers	47	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-10-17	2026-07-23
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Ling 3.0 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash is 4.7× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Ling 3.0 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50.

More comparisons