Gemini 4 Argon vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

Google
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.021 / $0.063
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 127.0× cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 4 Argon has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Gemini 4 ArgonLing 3.0 Flash
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.021
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.063
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.0315
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.0042
Context window1M262K
Max output944K33K
Intelligence index50.4—
Coding index—50.6
Providers6—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-132026-07-23
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Ling 3.0 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash is 127.0× cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 4 Argon vs Ling 3.0 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 4 Argon: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 4 Argon ≈ $9,000, Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50.

More comparisons