Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini 4 Carbon

Google
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $2.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 5.3× cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 4 Carbon scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (60 vs 9.8). Gemini 4 Carbon has the larger context window (1M vs 82K).
Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.20
Output price / 1M$10.00$2.40
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.75
Cached input / 1M$0.10—
Context window1M82K
Max output944K33K
Intelligence index609.8
Coding index—12.1
Providers7—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-102025-08-28
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 5.3× cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 4 Carbon: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 4 Carbon ≈ $9,000, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,600.

More comparisons