Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Google
$1.50 / $9.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $2.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 4.5× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash has the larger context window (131K vs 82K).
Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.20
Output price / 1M$9.00$2.40
Blended price (3:1)$3.38$0.75
Cached input / 1M——
Context window131K82K
Max output66K33K
Intelligence index—9.8
Coding index—12.1
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-11-052025-08-28
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 4.5× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash ≈ $7,500, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,600.

More comparisons