Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Trinity Large Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
A

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee Ai
$0.25 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
A
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 4.3× cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 10.8).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLTrinity Large Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.25
Output price / 1M$0.18$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$0.39
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.06
Context window262K262K
Max output33K80K
Intelligence index24.610.8
Coding index5725.8
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-04-01
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Trinity Large Thinking?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 4.3× cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Trinity Large Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. Trinity Large Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, Trinity Large Thinking ≈ $900.00.

More comparisons