Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
X

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
X
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 49% cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.14
Output price / 1M$0.18$0.28
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$0.18
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.0028
Context window262K1M
Max output33K131K
Intelligence index24.6
Coding index57
Providers2
Best provider uptime (30m)99.2%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-09-21
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 49% cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.

More comparisons