Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
Q
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 2.6× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLQwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.18$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.016
Context window262K1M
Max output33K131K
Intelligence index24.6
Coding index57
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-09-21
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 2.6× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons