Command A+ vs Trinity Large Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

C

Command A+

Cohere
$0.30 / $1.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
A

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee Ai
$0.25 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
C
A
Verdict: Trinity Large Thinking is 35% cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Trinity Large Thinking has the larger context window (262K vs 192K).
Command A+Trinity Large Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.25
Output price / 1M$1.50$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$0.60$0.39
Cached input / 1M$0.15$0.06
Context window192K262K
Max output64K80K
Intelligence index10.8
Coding index25.8
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222026-04-01
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is 35% cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Command A+ vs Trinity Large Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Command A+: 192,000 tokens. Trinity Large Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A+ ≈ $1,350, Trinity Large Thinking ≈ $900.00.

More comparisons