Claude Opus 5.5 vs Trinity Large Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic
$4.00 / $20.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
A

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee Ai
$0.25 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
A
Verdict: Trinity Large Thinking is 20.6× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (57.6 vs 10.8). Claude Opus 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Opus 5.5Trinity Large Thinking
Input price / 1M$4.00$0.25
Output price / 1M$20.00$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$8.00$0.39
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.06
Context window1M262K
Max output128K80K
Intelligence index57.610.8
Coding index25.8
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222026-04-01
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is 20.6× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Trinity Large Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Trinity Large Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, Trinity Large Thinking ≈ $900.00.

More comparisons