Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
inclusionAI
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 4.0× cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 18.2).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLQwen3.6 35B A3B
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.18$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$0.36
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.05
Context window262K262K
Max output33K236K
Intelligence index24.618.2
Coding index5741.9
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-04-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 4.0× cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, Qwen3.6 35B A3B ≈ $800.00.

More comparisons