Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic
$4.00 / $20.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 22.1× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (57.6 vs 18.2). Claude Opus 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Input price / 1M$4.00$0.15
Output price / 1M$20.00$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$8.00$0.36
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.05
Context window1M262K
Max output128K236K
Intelligence index57.618.2
Coding index41.9
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222026-04-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 22.1× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, Qwen3.6 35B A3B ≈ $800.00.

More comparisons