Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs LongCat 2.0

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

LongCat 2.0

Meituan
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
M
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 5.8× cheaper than LongCat 2.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 19.1). LongCat 2.0 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLLongCat 2.0
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.30
Output price / 1M$0.18$1.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$0.52
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.006
Context window262K1M
Max output33K262K
Intelligence index24.619.1
Coding index5745.3
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-07-20
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or LongCat 2.0?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 5.8× cheaper than LongCat 2.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs LongCat 2.0: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. LongCat 2.0: 1,048,756 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, LongCat 2.0 ≈ $1,200.

More comparisons