GLM 5.3 Prime vs LongCat 2.0
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: LongCat 2.0 is 8.2× cheaper than GLM 5.3 Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. LongCat 2.0 has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
| GLM 5.3 Prime | LongCat 2.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.80 | $0.30 |
| Output price / 1M | $8.80 | $1.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.30 | $0.52 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.56 | $0.006 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 262K |
| Intelligence index | — | 19.1 |
| Coding index | — | 45.3 |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-23 | 2026-07-20 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Prime or LongCat 2.0?
LongCat 2.0 is 8.2× cheaper than GLM 5.3 Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Prime vs LongCat 2.0: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Prime: 1,000,000 tokens. LongCat 2.0: 1,048,756 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Prime ≈ $10,000, LongCat 2.0 ≈ $1,200.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Prime vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 Prime vs Command A+GLM 5.3 Prime vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 Prime vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 Prime vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 Prime vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 Prime vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 Prime vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.3 Prime vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3 Prime vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.3 Prime vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.3 Prime vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 5.3 Prime vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Prime vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.3 Prime vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 5.3 Prime vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLongCat 2.0 vs Command A+LongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 LunaLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 Sol ProLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 SolLongCat 2.0 vs Claude Opus 5.5LongCat 2.0 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed