Granite 4.2 8B vs Trinity Large Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

IBM Granite

Granite 4.2 8B

IBM Granite
$0.06 / $0.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Arcee Ai

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee Ai
$0.25 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
IBM Granite
Arcee Ai
Verdict: Granite 4.2 8B is 4.7× cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Trinity Large Thinking scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (10.8 vs 5.1). Trinity Large Thinking has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Granite 4.2 8BTrinity Large Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.25
Output price / 1M$0.15$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$0.0825$0.39
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.06
Context window131K262K
Max output118K80K
Intelligence index5.110.8
Coding index22.425.8
Providers——
Best provider uptime (30m)——
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-312026-04-01
Retirement—2026-10-26

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Trinity Large Thinking?

Granite 4.2 8B is 4.7× cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Granite 4.2 8B vs Trinity Large Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Granite 4.2 8B: 131,072 tokens. Trinity Large Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Granite 4.2 8B ≈ $195.00, Trinity Large Thinking ≈ $900.00.

More comparisons