Claude Fable 5.2 vs Granite 4.2 8B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
IBM Granite

Granite 4.2 8B

IBM Granite
$0.06 / $0.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
IBM Granite
Verdict: Granite 4.2 8B is 193.9× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (64.6 vs 5.1). Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Claude Fable 5.2Granite 4.2 8B
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.06
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.15
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.0825
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.015
Context window1M131K
Max output128K118K
Intelligence index64.65.1
Coding index—22.4
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-08-31
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Granite 4.2 8B?

Granite 4.2 8B is 193.9× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Granite 4.2 8B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Granite 4.2 8B: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Granite 4.2 8B ≈ $195.00.

More comparisons